The McKinsey Quarterly

close Visitor Edition

McKinsey Quarterly is the business journal of McKinsey & Company.

Register to read this article

  • Recommendations (1)
  • Text Size
  • Print
  • Download PDF
  • Link to This

India and China: Asia’s non-identical twins

Sleeping Beauty versus Dungeons and Dragons. Why regional approaches aren’t working. An analysis of telecoms, pharmaceuticals, steel, paper, and food.



  • We’re sorry, exhibits are not available for this article.

For many corporations, India and China are two sides of the same coin. This is understandable. After all, India’s economic potential and the challenges it faces do look very much like those of China. And just as there was a fashion for China among multinational corporations, so India looks set to be the next flavor of the month.

But there the resemblance ends. Such is the weight of their economic histories that each country goes its own way when it comes to the practical matters of government policy and business opportunities.

Similar, but different

Comparing and contrasting India and China in terms of their size, past growth, political stability, bureaucratic barriers, and economic freedom has become commonplace. True, the two countries do face similar macroeconomic challenges, but their ways of responding to them are very different. Even their apparent convergence on the same model of economic development—deregulation and a greater openness to trade, foreign capital, and imported technologies—stops short at the level of policy implementation.

For multinational corporations, this means that treating India and China as similar entities with shared opportunities and pitfalls is a recipe for disaster. No generalization...

Free Membership

As a free member you can also:

  • Read hundreds of free articles
  • Receive e-mail newsletters and alerts
  • Search our archive

Simply fill in this form

View our privacy policy.
We will not share your e-mail. See details.

* Required

New In:
Embed E-mail